CHAPTER 1: INTEGRATED TRANSPORT STRATEGY

Inner Sydney is crucial to maintaining Sydney as Australia's world city. Rapid growth in the 1990s has left all transport systems close to capacity. Street space is in especially short supply. The need to expand capacity to meet future growth and to improve environmental outcomes demands a new integrated transport strategy.

The Inner Sydney Transport Challenge

Sydney City is the traditional heart of Australia's global city: It has the highest concentration of jobs in the country, with over 350,000 people working inside the City's new boundaries. It generates 3 billion in economic activity, 8% of national income, and almost a third of Sydney's Gross Regional Income.

It is the also the most important tourist destination in Australia, with the seven most popular international tourist destinations in the country and two-thirds of the total tourist accommodation in the Sydney region.

The 1990s saw unprecedented growth:

While Sydney is Australia's largest and most dynamic city, it is also our oldest. Sydney's harbour-side charm and narrow streets provide a unique environment but also pose a major transport challenge.

The limited space in the CBD and indeed throughout the inner suburbs makes Sydney particularly vulnerable to traffic congestion. As people have returned to the city, and as activity increases, our growing reliance on the car is threatening both the quality of life and economic efficiency.

A new integrated transport strategy is needed to address this challenge. Sydney needs a world class transport system if it is to remain a world class city. While there are important transport needs across the Sydney region, the specific characteristics of inner Sydney demand a particular response for this important area.

A Little History

Australia's earliest European settlement grew up rapidly to become the major city. Sydney was fortunate in developing an extensive heavy rail and tramway system during the last decades of the 19th and the first decades of the 20th century. Patronage on both systems grew rapidly, with 400 million passengers using what was one of the largest street-based tramway systems in the world in the 1940s.

In common with many other cities ranging from Brisbane to London, the trams were removed in the 1950s under the prevailing philosophy of car-based transport, and replaced with buses which were considered more flexible. However even today, State Transit Authority buses carry fewer than half the number of people once carried by the trams. Indeed, the buses both suffer from and contribute to growing road congestion.

Many other cities around the world have come to regret removing their trams, and have begun to re-install them in the form of modernised light rail systems. Examples range from Paris, London and Strasbourg, to Philadelphia, New Orleans and Pittsburgh. Other cities, such as many of the rapidly growing metropolises in Asia which never had trams, have installed totally new systems.

This follows a world wide trend to recapture the cities for pedestrians and to improve environmental quality and urban amenity, which have been eroded under the onslaught of ever rising traffic. Light rail and tramway systems are seen as having the capacity and environmental benefits to revitalise on-street transport networks, and to complement underground or in some cases overhead rail based systems in larger cities.

Sydney now stands at a crossroads. With over 0 billion invested in motorways in the last decade, Sydney has not solved its rising traffic problem. Indeed, this has helped encourage a mode shift away from public transport, walking and cycling, and fuelled growth in traffic. This has been exacerbated by a rapid rise in car use and car ownership, with record car sales in the last few years.

Most transport commentators have concluded that the trends in Sydney are undesirable from an environmental, social and economic perspective, and are unsustainable into the future. A shift in the balance of our transport investment is now urgently required.

Transport Systems are at Capacity

The growth in population, employment, tourism and education in inner Sydney has led to rapid growth in traffic and in public transport use, especially on key approaches to the CBD: As a result, there is limited capacity left in the transport systems in peak periods: The problems for on-street transport and for buses are particularly apparent:

Environmental and Health Issues

The growth in traffic has already had a significant impact on amenity, health and the quality of life, with major campaigns by residents objecting to the location of ventilation stacks from road tunnels.

Mobile sources account for almost half of the emissions of volatile organic compounds, 80% of nitrogen oxides, and almost 20% of particulates. Diesel-powered vehicles in particular contribute to nitrogen oxides and particulates emissions, as well as being a major source of air toxics such as Xylenes, Toluene, Styrene, PAHs, Formaldehyde, Ethylbenzene and Benzene.

Concentrations of these chemicals are a particular issue in inner city streets where large numbers of buses operate, and where the highest concentrations of pedestrians occur.

In addition, buses are a major source of noise in the CBD and along major arterials. With 7,400 State Transit Buses alone, as well as increasing numbers of private buses and tourist coaches driving through the city daily, the amenity of the city is significantly impacted.

At a wider level, there is growing concern at obesity and its related health effects in Australia. Whereas public transport trips almost always involve a walking component (half of all walk trips are associated with a public transport trip), car trips act as a substitute for walking. The high and growing volume of traffic on inner city streets has all but made cycling impossible except for a few isolated locations where cycle paths are available. There is an urgent need to increase the amount of space available for both pedestrians and cyclists and to improve the amenity and safety for those engaging in active transport.

The City of Sydney is developing a cycling strategy to assist in this regard, and some steps have been taken over the years to close selected streets in the city to traffic, including Martin Place, Hay Street, and the Pitt Street Mall. However Sydney lags well behind leading cities overseas, which have up to four times more pedestrianised streets than Sydney.

It is interesting that many of the cities which are leading in this respect also have major tourist industries. If Sydney is to maintain its international appeal, it will need to keep up with other world cities or face the possibility of losing valuable tourist revenue, including from the growing conference tourism and business tourism markets.

The importance of improving pedestrian space, safety and amenity is underlined by the fact that there are 550,000 pedestrian trips daily in Central Sydney, and that these make up 85% of all trips.

Future Growth in the Travel Task

While there has been a pause in the growth in travel demand in Inner Sydney since the Olympics-related peak in 2000/2001, it can confidently be expected that growth will resume: Latest forecasts by DIPNR indicate that: Estimates of travel demand (Martin Walsh and Associates, 2002) indicate that there is likely to be growth by 2021 of : If traffic growth is to be slowed or reversed, then the growth rates for public transport, walking and cycling must be higher than these.

Implications of Business as Usual

What is likely to happen if we continue to take a business as usual approach? The data suggests that: Under this scenario, it is likely that business would suffer in the city, and Sydney will lose out on international investment, jobs and economic activity.

Sydney's main competitors are overseas world cities, rather than regional centres in NSW or other State capitals. Modern financial and other businesses can readily relocate to cities which offer the best overall business climate and quality of life, the key to attracting and holding staff in a globally competitive world.

As London discovered, there are long-term costs of inaction on transport. Their response has been to introduce a congestion charge to free up the city, improve its amenity, and to encourage a shift to public transport. Sydney will need to be pro-active if it is to compete with other global cities.

Integrated Transport Strategy

A new Integrated Transport Strategy is needed to achieve a world class transport system for Inner Sydney. Key, Goals, Objectives and Elements of the Strategy are outlined below:
Key Goals
Specific Objectives
Key Elements of the Plan